
MMA is Saving the Martial Arts, Not Hurting It
By Tom Callos
Some, but of course not all, of the “traditional” martial arts world is up in arms about the destructive forces of MMA (Mixed Martial Arts). MMA is characterized, incorrectly I might add, as the tattooed fighter, the guy with more biceps than good manners, and represented by wonderful role models like the clean cut boys from Tapout (I missed meeting Tapout’s part owner “Punkass” at the “Martial Arts Industry’s Supershow,” when I decided I would take at least a 10 year vacation from any event related to “The Martial Arts Industry”).
Bruce Lee was MMA, as was a lot of the martial arts visionaries that came from Japan, Korea, Okinawa, Malaysia, India, and China. The fact that the UFC is the violent, hyper-masculine, sexist frontman of what works in the “cage,” and what doesn’t —and that its spectacles capture a bigger audience than Obama’s speeches, Al Jazeera, and NPR together, doesn’t mean that MMA isn’t also a healthy wake-up call to the martial arts world.
In the 1970’s there were just as many punks, proportionately, in the traditional karate point-fighting world as there are today in MMA. My friends and I had long hair, we cussed like sailors, we drank —and more —when we could get away with it, and we talked smack about almost everything we experienced.
If we had been unfortunate enough to have cameras and microphones shoved into our faces back then, like a lot of the young toughs do today, we’d have said just as many stupid things as they do. Albeit, they would have been stupid 1970 and 1980 things, which were, as I recollect, kinder, gentler stupid things, but they would have been almost exactly as dumb and derelict as what you can hear today on any show where young men who like to fight congregate.
What MMA is doing is deeply upsetting the brand names of the traditional martial arts world.
Karate? Taekwondo? Hello 8-track tape player and Pong.
MMA takes all the borders and barriers of style and system and blends them, on high speed, into something that the old school knows, on some level, is good for the martial arts, but that really upsets all the work they did to differentiate themselves from the other cans on the shelf.
MMA is good because it doesn’t necessarily respect the part of the martial arts world that has grown safe, crusty, and non-threatening. MMA is good because it helps us define the difference between art and function —and for awhile there, we had lost our perspective on it all. And the truth be told, MMA was traditional martial arts before traditional martial arts was traditional.
No, what’s REALLY bad for the martial arts world is the blatant commercialization of the martial arts school “industry.”
It’s having people prioritize business systems, meant to create maximum profit with the least amount of effort and investment, over genuine education and martial arts ideas.
What’s really bad for the martial arts is that we haven’t in all of these years, created a real, industry-wide, comprehensive self-defense training program for teachers. What’s really bad is that the powers-that-be in the school business industry don’t think very far beyond the bottom line of their profit and loss statement (there are, of course, exceptions).
It’s sad that self-defense has changed so much, but the “industry” is so full of pizza party manuals, birthday party promotions, strategies for selling $10,000 black belt programs to 9-year-olds, and the iconic and telling statements like the one uttered to me at what was probably my last “industry” event: “How do we monetize that?”
Of course, all of this could turn on a dime. The martial arts industry could, in a year’s time, embrace education over the marketing of more questionably useful products. The industry could bring self-defense training into the 21st Century and we might develop real training programs that address today’s self-defense issues.
Imagine classes dealing with domestic abuse, self-image issues, teen-dating issues, health concerns, drug abuse, dietary training, and peace education. The billing companies and consulting firms could quit dumping their toxic waste of cheap and easy tactics for creating “floods of new students,” and we could all learn to sell the martial arts by what we do in our communities, over sending out text-message spam (a recent industry-consultant recommendation).
MMA is saving the martial arts as it’s raw and unpolished. It’s not easy to package in a fancy silk uniform. It’s about what works -and not necessarily where it came from. It’s saving the martial arts because its challenging school owners to get real, to quit hiding behind any artifice or blown up rank. It’s bringing fresh new (old) ideas into the arts. And I know for a fact, as I’m in one of the premier MMA schools in the world, BJ Penn’s Academy in Hilo, Hawaii, there are just as many manners and traditions taught in the school I’m in, as in the strip-mall taekwondo/karate school down the street.
MMA is, for sure, a lot better for the martial arts than an industry that worships the Ferrari, the big cigar, the Armani suit, the Rolex, and a measurement of success contingent upon who has the highest gross —or net —income. Long live MMA —long live the martial arts!